Alex Murdaugh Breaks Down Crying On Stand – And Admits He LIED About Whereabouts Throughout Spouse & Son’s Murders

After infinite discussions about his shaky model of occasions, Alex Murdaugh is lastly giving his testimony.

On Thursday, the disgraced South Carolina lawyer took to the stand to plead his case amid allegations he murdered his spouse, Maggie, and son Paul on June 7, 2021. And whereas he’s removed from completed answering questions, it’s already been a really revealing day in courtroom!!

Associated: It Wasn’t Ted Bundy! Chilly Case Homicide Lastly Solved After 50 Years!

Based on Individuals, when the protection requested Alex if he had used a gun to “blow his son’s mind out” or to shoot his spouse, he denied killing both of them, sustaining:

“I didn’t shoot my spouse or my son.”

As he continued to speak in regards to the emotional night time, nonetheless, his voice started to shake as he held again tears, saying:

“I may by no means deliberately do something to harm both of them. Not ever.”

The daddy went on to debate his connection together with his late son, who was simply 22 on the time of his loss of life. Apparently, Alex had nicknamed Paul “Pau Pau” or “Pau Terry,” monikers many individuals used to consult with him. Describing the younger man’s character, he continued:

“You couldn’t be round Pau Pau with out having enjoyable. He was an absolute delight.”

However right here’s the place issues bought actually inneresting… The protection requested Alex if he had been fully truthful with investigators about his whereabouts on the night time of the double homicide — and he stated NO! He revealed:

“I did lie.”


Associated: Reporter & Little one Shot By Killer Who Returned To Scene Of Prior Homicide

Alex beforehand claimed the final time he noticed his spouse and son was throughout a household dinner at their residence. Based on his apparently false earlier story, Maggie and Paul then went to the canine kennels on their property with out him and he didn’t see them once more till after their murders. So, that is clearly a extremely stunning mislead admit to! The protection (AKA these on Alex’s staff) stored calm as they requested him why he had fibbed — clearly they knew this was coming. Alex blamed it on his drug dependancy, noting:

“As my dependancy advanced over time I might get in these conditions or circumstances the place I might get paranoid.”

He defined that he “wasn’t pondering clearly” after he was instantly questioned about his family members’ deaths. His dependancy mixed together with his “mistrust for SLED” led him to lie to guard himself. For this, he apologized, saying:

“I’m sorry that [I lied]. I’m sorry to my son Buster [his surviving son], I’m sorry to Grandma and Pappa T. I’m sorry to each of our households.”

That stated, it wasn’t only a one-time lie. When requested why he continued to share the faux particulars, he said:

“What a tangled net we weave. As soon as I informed a lie — then I informed my household — I needed to preserve mendacity.”

It raises the query: what else may he be mendacity about??

One motive the protection doubtless determined to get this reveal out of their consumer is due to explosive proof that allegedly positioned the daddy on the scene of the crime moments earlier than the killings. As Perezcious readers know, Maggie and Paul have been shot useless close to the canine kennels on their household’s property at round 8:50 p.m. Alex had argued he was not on the kennels on the time of the deaths, however prosecutors uncovered a video recorded on the 22-year-old’s son telephone simply minutes earlier than the killings during which all three of their voices could possibly be heard. A number of witnesses additionally testified they heard Alex talking within the background of the recording.

So he’s proudly owning as much as the truth that he was close to the canine kennels throughout that tragic occasion. And never too lengthy earlier than his family members have been killed. Why?

See, he was already caught in a lie, and that’s clearly going to harm his case with the jury. So the protection should determine by admitting to the lie however NOT the killing, his story will all of the sudden make sense? And the jury can imagine him now? It could be too little too late because it raises doubts about whether or not the remainder of his alibi was a lie, too!

We’re going to have to attend and see what else he owns as much as in courtroom, and in the end, it’ll be as much as the jury. Take a look at what he needed to say for himself (under).

Ideas? Do you suppose this reveal will assist his case? Or harm it?? Sound OFF (under)!

[Image via Maggie Murdaugh/Facebook & Law & Crime Network/YouTube]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.